uk foreign aid budget by country listuk foreign aid budget by country list

Office for Statistics Regulation published their finding from the compliance check of SID which confirmed that it is designated a National Statistics. In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. Provision of technical assistance in tax policy and administration issues to support the strengthening of tax systems in developing countries. These extra details allow the ODA spend to be quality assured using guidance from OECD. , From 2018 onwards, Official Development Assistance (ODA) has changed from being measured on a cash basis to a grant equivalent basis, following a decision taken by the DAC in 2014. In addition, the CSSFs Rapid Response Mechanism allows funding to be released immediately, across government departments to respond to a crisis. To get a sense of relative magnitude, Russian disbursements in 2015 amounted to roughly half of Italian aid that year. We use some essential cookies to make this website work. developing country, unspecified ODA) (Figure 11). Major sectors are ordered from top to bottom by largest 2019 0DA spend. In 2016, the UK spent 13.4 billion on overseas aid, in line with the 0.7% target. For the first time since 2014, there was no core contribution to the IMF-Poverty Reduction Growth Trust. For comparability, UK ODA data by recipient countries is also for 2018. This allows you to filter projects by country and sector and view further details about the project as published in documents such as the business case and annual review. Since 1970, the UN has set a target for donor countries to contribute 0.7% of their GNI to foreign aid. In 2014, China's aid flows were officially estimated at over $4 billion per yearsimilar in volume to Canada or Norway, and about a third of the size of the UK's aid budget. Dark blue = Africa, light blue = Asia, grey = Americas, pink = Europe, teal = Pacific. In comparison, over the previous five years (2014 to 2018) bilateral ODA represented on average 62.4%. This was an increase of 211 million (or 1.9%) compared with 2018. . These are based on gross national income per capita published by the World Bank. Charts and tables (data up to 2019) from the Report: Development Aid at a Glance 2021. The top 3 recipients of Humanitarian Aid spend were Yemen (219m), Syria (194m) and Bangladesh (125m). The DAC sets the definitions and classifications for reporting on ODA internationally. UK bilateral ODA spend was 9,533 million (65.8% of total UK . The OECD statistics provide ODA breakdowns for DAC donors (including multilaterals). The Joint Funds are covered separately as a whole, regardless of which Government Department spends the money. The strategy is published in the context of reduced UK aid spending and the Government's wider foreign policy intentions to increase UK efforts in Africa and the Indo-Pacific, partly in response to China. A casual observer might be optimistic about the future of Canadian aid. If a multilateral organisation does not report to the DAC but works in multiple sectors and/or countries, then its core contributions are not allocated to a country or sector. Multilateral Aid: When multiple governments pool resources in cooperation with organizations like the World Bank, the IMF, and the UN. This approach is in line with how DFID dealt with the last major GNI methodology change[footnote 29] and provides consistency between the in-year monitoring and reporting of the ODA:GNI ratio. In 2019, 97.1% of DFIDs region-specific bilateral ODA went to countries in Africa and Asia (4,224m). Entertainment & Pop Culture; Geography & Travel; Health & Medicine; Lifestyles & Social Issues; Literature; Philosophy & Religion; Politics, Law & Government This shift in share was in part driven by the decrease seen in the UKs core contributions to multilaterals as well as the actual increase in bilateral ODA spend. Core contributions to multilateral organisations: A full breakdown of UK ODA by Government Department and Other Contributors of UK ODA and delivery channel in 2015, 2018 and 2019 is available online in Table 10. This support relates to the provision of publicly-funded education services for asylum seekers of compulsory school age. Multilateral funding, by Government Departments and other contributors[footnote 20]. The estimate for the UKs EU attribution in 2019 was 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018, EU attribution fluctuates from year to year because the EU works on a 7 year programming cycle and so EU disbursements in a given year can vary. Table 4 shows multilateral UK ODA in 2015, 2018 and 2019 by government agency and delivery channel i.e. FCDO releases 2 editions of Statistics on International Development over the year: provisional UK Aid spend will be published in the spring and includes a preliminary estimate of the UKs ODA:GNI ratio for the previous calendar year. There are multiple levels of sector classification used: at the lowest level are sector codes[footnote 16] that describe specific areas, and these are then grouped together into OECD DAC broad sectors. The UK government has been signed up to the target since 1974, but reached it for the first . For a full breakdown of UK-ODA by government department and other contributors to UK ODA by delivery channel for 2015, 2018 and 2019 please see Table 10. Whilst the majority of funding is delivered via multi-year programmes or spending commitments, each year the CSSF reviews its spending via the allocations process. After final decisions on UK ODA spending are made the GNI estimate can still shift due to later economic data for the year becoming available, so can the amount of ODA spent by other government departments and ODA contributions from non-departmental sources. It outspends the next largest, Germany, by more than $10 billion a year; the United Kingdom, Japan, and France follow. Education (for compulsory school age) and healthcare for asylum seekers based in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Spend increased by 56 million on 2018 to 207 million in 2019. The government reduced its annual aid budget from 0.7% of gross national income (GNI), which is a measure of the amount produced by the economy, to 0.5% this year. This was primarily driven by an increase in humanitarian aid spending (45m increase on 2018) with material relief assistance and services being provided for Rohingya refugees, Tanzania moved out of the top 10 recipients of UK bilateral ODA, this was partly driven by a decrease in spend to programmes focused on social and economic infrastructure and services (Figure 7), total UK bilateral ODA received by LDCs and Other LICs increased by 13.1% (328m) from 2,496 million in 2018 to 2,823 million in 2019 (Figure 8). The Cross-Government Prosperity Fund promotes economic reform and development in recipient countries. When DFID or other UK government departments provide core funding to multilateral organisations, the funding is pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilaterals. For the 2019 ODA:GNI ratio, the GNI estimate is based on the pre-Blue Book 2019 framework since the first quarterly estimate of 2019 GNI under the new framework did not become available until 30 September 2019. BEISs ODA includes spend on International Climate Finance, jointly managed with FCDO and DEFRA. Figure 1 shows the total amount of UK ODA spending each year since 1970. As of this reporting, it has disbursed over $32 billion. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. , Statistics on International Development, Final UK Aid Spend, 2019, p. 18, Figure 5, Figure 18 is based on the provisional 2019 ODA data from all 29 DAC member countries, except the UK for which final 2019 ODA data is used. For example, the International Development Association (IDA), which is part of the World Bank Group, has been one of the largest recipients of UK multilateral ODA since 2013 and the UK remains its biggest donor. , Iraq = 5 per cent; India = 5 per cent; Indonesia = 2 per cent. If you require any other data or information, or if you have any thoughts about how to improve the publication, please contact the statistics team at: [email protected]. These are extracted from DFIDs ARIES database, and the detailed data is subject to input errors from spending teams. Chart by Carbon Brief using Highcharts. Also included is spend within specific sectors for which there are no designated benefitting country or region or where benefitting countries are not known until the end of the programme[footnote 11] (section 4.1.5). Only asylum seekers within the first 12 months after they make a claim for asylum in the UK are included. , z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. Individual departments that bid for funding are accountable for their own spending and delivery under the given fund. Total bilateral ODA=10.3 billion, of which 4.4 billion (42.4%) is spent in unspecified countries/regions. The CSSF is able to respond both to evolving security threats and unforeseen crises. Spend to these countries accounted for 17.9% of total country-specific UK bilateral ODA, Pakistan has remained the top recipient of UK bilateral ODA for the fifth consecutive year. Much of the humanitarian aid budget will be focused on countries most at risk of famine such as Yemen, Syria . DfEs ODA covers support of asylum seekers in the first 12 months after they make a claim for asylum in the UK. This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. HMRC supports developing countries revenue authorities to improve their tax administration functions and tax policies to increase revenue collection, providing economic integration, stability and growth. This was mostly due to an increase in humanitarian aid spend, with the largest country specific increase to Yemen (see Case Study 1, p. 32, for a more detailed look at the story in Yemen). Other Technical Assistance includes training and research, a further 8.6% consists of core support to Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) or other delivery partners, such as research institutions, where funds are not earmarked for a particular country/region and work may benefit a wide range of developing countries. the donor has specified where and/or what the ODA is spent on this is usually ODA going to specific countries, regions or programmes. , GNI is monitored using forecasts published by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) to manage the 0.7% commitment, See background note (p. 43) in SID 2017, See OECD, Aid Statistics, Methodology webpage. Figure 8 legend: Breakdown of Country-Specific UK Bilateral ODA by Country Income Group, 2009-2019. From 2018 onwards, ODA has changed from being measured on a cash basis to being measured on a grant equivalent basis, following a decision taken by the DAC in 2014[footnote 3]. UK climate finance spending by government department, 2011/12-2016/17. The country names and numbers inside each bar are how the rank for that country compared to last year (2018), coloured in red if its decreased (with a red downward pointing arrow), green if its increased (with a green upward pointing arrow) and black if its unmoving (with black horizontal pointing arrow). The top 3 spending sectors in this area were Public Sector Policy and Administrative Management (217m), Civilian Peace-Building, Conflict Prevention and Resolution (199m) and Media and free flow of information (119m). From 2020, the ODA:GNI ratio will be calculated according to the new methodology. While there has been an increase since 2018, the total bilateral ODA to Africa remains below this peak (7m less than levels in 2017). During a consultation conducted in 2014, users told us that they use the statistics for a variety of purposes: preparing material for briefs; PQs and public correspondence; inclusion in reports and reviews and providing data for research and monitoring. The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said in a statement that Britain spent more than 11 billion in aid in 2021 and to date has invested 4.4 billion to fight H.I.V., tuberculosis . FCDO is responsible for collating data and reporting spend on ODA to the Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD), including the 0.7% ODA:GNI ratio commitment. Select country to view. HMT ODA relates to a core contribution to the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and development-related administrative costs. The FCO ODA programmes concentrated on the strategic objectives of promoting global prosperity, and strengthening global peace, security and governance. Foreign aid by country 2022. Office for National Statistics technical assistance to build capacity of statistical systems in developing countries. This avoids double counting in Table 3 and the total UK EU attribution is not affected. The UK pledged to spend at least 0.7 per cent of GNI on foreign aid in 1970. We will be reaching out to users via the Statistics at FCDO page to help us plan future developments and meet users analytical needs as far as possible. There are two types of bilateral ODA: Core multilateral ODA is un-earmarked funding from national governments to multilateral organisations[footnote 4], which are pooled with other donors funding and disbursed as part of the core budget of the multilateral organisation[footnote 5]. The size of the dots corresponds to the total amount of ODA spent in each income groups sector. Figure 13 provides a breakdown of sector spend by DFID and all Other Government Departments and other contributors of ODA (non-DFID). Figure 8: Country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2009-2019. The House of Lords will hold a debate on the subject on 15 December 2022. This was partly due to an increase in Developing Country Unspecified spending in 2019. As a percent of . The UK's foreign aid budget is being "raided" by the Home Office to cover the costs of hotel accommodation for refugees, a committee of MPs has claimed. Bilateral ODA includes spend to specific countries or regions (sections 4.1.1-4.1.4) as well as spend to multiple countries and/or regions[footnote 10]. In 2015 the International Development (Official Development Assistance Target) Act placed the 0.7% commitment in UK law from 2015 and in each subsequent calendar year. The remaining top recipients of UK ODA were Pakistan and Nigeria, Afghanistan remains the largest recipient of DAC country members ODA totalling 2.7 billion in 2018. Former international development secretary Andrew Mitchell has tabled an amendment . 4. A glossary, explaining key terms used throughout this report, is available in Annex 1, See commitments made by the UK and other donors at the 2005 G8 Summit in Gleneagles, For more information on the grant equivalent measure and the impact on UK ODA, see background note 6.2, The multilateral must be on the OECD DAC list of eligible multilaterals in order to receive unearmarked funding. Ukrainian troops have liberated nearly 30,000 square miles of their territory from Russian forces since the invasion began on Feb. 24, 2022, but Putin appears to be . In 2020, the most recent year for which the data is complete, military aid accounted for 23% of all foreign aid spending - the smallest share since 2004 - while economic assistance accounted . This was an increase of 101 million compared to 2018. For the departmental breakdown see Table 4b. For example, Afghanistan in 2018 was in 4th position, and in 2019 is in 3rd position (a change of +1). The DAC publish detailed information of the multilaterals country and sector spending in December. The introduction of the grant-equivalent[footnote 24] measure in 2018 primarily affects countries with a high proportion of loans in their 2019 ODA portfolio. The President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Budget Request for the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is $60.4 billion, which includes $29.4 billion for USAID fully and partially managed accounts, $1.7 billion (6 percent) above the FY 2022 Request. Other reasons to give foreign aid include to reward a government for behavior desired by the donor, to extend the donor's cultural influence, to provide the infrastructure needed by the donor for resource extraction from the recipient country, or to gain other kinds of . This followed a peak in 2017 as a result of high levels of humanitarian aid. Over 5 years: Increasing from 2015, spend to Asia reached a peak in 2016 before steadily falling by 109 million to 2,235 million in 2018. Section 1 - overview. Bilateral ODA to Europe has increased from 55 million in 2015 to 189 million in 2019. See our note on Multiple Sector Codes for Project Activity Analysis 2017 which looks at the impact of this methodology change, Economic Services & Infrastructure include programmes that focus on Transport, Energy Generation, Banking & Financial Services and Business. 4 minutes read. This is an increase in spend (5,659m in 2018) but a decrease in terms of percentage share from 2018 (61.3% in 2018). Non-DFID contributors also spent a larger proportion of their ODA in Europe and the Americas (19.9%), compared to DFID (2.8%). Its activities include, among others, primary education, basic health services, clean water and sanitation, agriculture, business climate improvements, infrastructure, and institutional reforms. Outside of the top 5 sectors by bilateral spend, the largest changes between 2018 and 2019 were Production Sectors (increased by 171m) and support for asylum seekers in the UK known as Refugees in Donor Countries (increased by 108m). The largest OGD shares of ODA were: the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) (6.3% of ODA); the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (4.5%), the Conflict, Stability and Security Fund (4.3%); and the Home Office (3.0%), the largest non-departmental sources (referred to as Other UK Contributors of ODA in Figure 3) were non-DFID EU attribution (3.2% of UK ODA) and Gift Aid claimed by charities working on ODA eligible activities (1.0% of UK ODA). Largest donors of humanitarian aid worldwide 2022, by country. Delivery of leadership and tax audit training to tax administration officials from developing countries. Figure 1: UK ODA levels ( billions) and ODA:GNI ratios (%), 1970 - 2019. Funding on research activities increased by 90 million while spending on climate-related programmes increased by 20 million, the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund spent 176 million of ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 83 million, or 88.3%, on 2018. The Cross-Government Prosperity Fund has increased its ODA spend year on year, since the fund started spending ODA in 2016, as they move more programmes into implementation, despite DFIDs ODA spend increasing, DFIDs share of total ODA dropped from 74.9% in 2018 to 73.1% in 2019. The latest edition of this publication can be found on GOV.UK, final UK Aid spend is usually published in the autumn. For more information please see the published note which outlines a new approach in more detail and provides an opportunity for users to give feedback. DEFRAs ODA programming supports the delivery of all four UK Aid Strategy objectives by strengthening global peace, security and governance, strengthening resilience and response to crises, promoting Global Prosperity and tackling extreme poverty and helping the worlds most vulnerable. Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS). More of the UK's foreign aid budget is being spent in the UK rather than in poor developing countries, according to a report by Centre for Global Development (CGD). They are published prior to the release of final ODA statistics by the OECD DAC for all OECD members. It comes after Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab set out the allocations for UK ODA spending for 2021-22 to MPs, with the government acting on its decision to cut the UK's annual foreign aid . A new report from the cross-party Commons international development committee of MPs hits out at the use of the Foreign . For example, support to the World Food Programmes (WFP) Emergency Operations in Yemen, other bilateral: this is earmarked ODA spent directly by governments or through other delivery partners, such as Non-Governmental and Civil Society Organisations, research institutions and universities. The 2019 final ODA:GNI ratio is based on a GNI estimate published by the ONS on 30 June 2020. The increase in capital will be used to make investments in Africa and South Asia, ODA spend by departments other than DFID (Other Government Departments - OGDs) and other contributors of UK ODA (referred to collectively in Table 2 as non-DFID spend) was 4,090 million in 2019, an increase of 434 million, or 11.9%, on 2018, ODA spend by Other Government Departments was the driver behind the increase in non-DFID ODA, with the top 7 highest spending departments all spending more when compared with 2018. Its worth noting that, like other multilateral organisations, core contributions to IDA are based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, four of the top 5 receiving organisations of UK multilateral ODA in 2019 were among the top 5 multilaterals in 2018. Multilateral funding, by Government Departments and other contributors, Statistics on International Development: Provisional Aid Spend 2019, International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) standard, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/official-development-assistance-oda2, See commitments made by the UK and other donors at the 2005 G8 Summit in Gleneagles, Information on the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund, Frontline Diplomatic Activity (FDA) costs are administrative costs of core programme and operational delivery in or in favour of DAC-listed recipient countries that meet the primary ODA purpose, Multiple Sector Codes for Project Activity Analysis 2017, OECD report on donors provisional figures, OECD, Aid Statistics, Methodology webpage, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). The ONS publishes revisions to GNI estimates as more economic data becomes available. Figure 4 legend: UK bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009 2019. Income groups: DFID - non-DFID comparison 2019, Figure 9: Breakdown of country-specific bilateral ODA by Income Group, 2019. Table 3: Top Twenty Recipients of UK Core Funding to Multilateral Organisations - Multilateral ODA 2018 and 2019 LONDON British ministers are being urged to spend the U.K.'s constrained aid budget in the world's poorest and most vulnerable nations rather than allocating spending to the Home Office. Section 2 - largest donors and recipients in a region. This primarily is linked to food and shelter for up to 12 months. The Prime Minister will walk into the G7 summit as the only leader who is cutting development aid to the world's poorest. U.S. Foreign Assistance by Country. The countries within the top 10 remained unchanged from 2018[footnote 25]. 2019 spend coloured in dark blue, 2018 spend in light blue. This publication updates previous provisional figures of UK ODA for 2019 published in April 2020. This could have an impact on the recent trends of some recipient countries. Spend in Pakistan was mainly focused on Education (38.4%) as well as Government and Civil Society (16.4%) (see Section 4.2.3 for more information on sector specific breakdowns), Ethiopia has remained the second largest recipient of bilateral ODA although spend slightly decreased in 2019 from 2018 - a decrease of 2 million.

Mass General Knee Surgeons, Lorne Michaels Politics, John Judge Aaron Judge Brother, Where Does Michael Peterson Currently Live, Eisenhower High School Class Of 2000, Articles U